Dawson v. Student Loan Solutions
NYLAG Sues to Stop Illegal Collection of Very Old Private Student Loans
About Dawson v. Student Loan Solutions
More Information
Name: Dawson v. Student Loan Solutions
Dkt. #: 23 Civ. 9690 (S.D.N.Y. 2023)
Court: United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
Judge: Hon. Mary K. Vyskocil
Status: In litigation
Claims: Violations of the FDCPA, 15 U.S.C. § 1692, and N.Y. Gen. Bus. § 349
Plaintiff Roxanne Dawson, represented by NYLAG, filed this case to challenge Defendant Student Loan Solutions’s unlawful lawsuits to collect on very old private student loans, in violation of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act and the New York General Business Law § 349.
Ms. Dawson obtained a private student loan from Bank of America in 2007, when she was a teenager, and her loan went into default in the early 2010s. Defendant Student Loan Solutions is a debt buyer: a company that buys student loan debt from the bank that originally issued it. Student Loan Solutions bought Ms. Dawson’s loan in 2017, years after the statute of limitations on the loan had already expired. Nonetheless, Student Loan Solutions sued Ms. Dawson in 2022 in Bronx Civil Court, in order to collect tens of thousands of dollars of old debt—but that debt is too old to be allowed to be collected in a lawsuit. Further, Student Loan Solutions calculated the amount Ms. Dawson supposedly owed based only on an “estimate” of what her monthly payments would be, not her actual payments.
Ms. Dawson is not alone. Student Loan Solutions took the same steps against thousands of other borrowers, in New York and across the country, to unlawfully collect on decades-old private student loan debt based on faulty calculations. Ms. Dawson brought this case to protect not only her own rights, but also the rights of the thousands of other student loan borrowers in her position.
Contact
If you were sued by Student Loan Solutions to collect a very old private student loan, contact us at 212-613-5032.
Highlights
- Cross-Motions for summary judgment and Plaintiff’s motion for class certification submitted in early 2025.
Documents
- Amended Complaint [ECF No. 16]
- Plaintiff’s motion for class certification and class-wide summary judgment [ECF No. 82]
- Plaintiff’s 56.1 statement [ECF No. 84]
- Plaintiff’s opposition to Defendant’s motion for summary judgment and reply in support of class certification and summary judgment [ECF No. 106]